Thursday, 16. December 2004 10:05
A person close to me has been insisting we need to “let” Griffin cry-it-out in order for him to sleep better. Ironically I was awake for hours last night upset about the ensuing conversation.
This is something I feel strongly about and I’m still riled up from the conversation so I’ll be on a soapbox for the rest of this post.
Many years ago Julian and I had a roommate who had spent several years in Africa. We both remember her telling us that babies in Africa don’t cry. This isn’t something she was told, it’s something she noticed. Babies everywhere, none of them crying. Her theory was that it was because in Africa babies are held all the time and this made sense to us. I’ve since seen studies that show that her observation was accurate, in the US pediatricians measure babies’ crying in hours per day while anthropologists in other countries measure it in minutes per day.
Julian and I are doing attachment parenting. We aren’t doing this because we read it in a book, it’s what what we were planning to do before we knew there was a name for it. This is the best description I’ve seen of attachment parenting:
Attachment parenting, aka instinctive parenting, recognizes that children are dependent by design and that their eventual independence depends on a foundation of security, trust, empathy, and respect. This requires AP parents to respond promptly and compassionately to their children’s cries and other communications. Attachment parenting may include breastfeeding on demand, responding promptly to your baby’s cries, and welcoming your baby into your bed.
For me the most important, critical part of this is that you don’t “let” a baby cry without trying to help. Especially in the early months there are times the baby will cry and you can’t figure out what to do about it, but you at least need to hold them and try to comfort them. It’s all they’ve got to communicate with you.
The thing is that crying-it-out works, and there are lots of experts making lots of money telling parents to do this. It works by making the baby give up. There’s plenty of scientific evidence to back this up, it creates a psychological condition called “learned helplessness” in babies, and babies that are left to cry don’t grow as well and can end up under medical care for “failure to thrive”. Beyond the science, though, it goes against all your instincts to not respond when your baby is crying.
Attachment goes both directions – you want your baby to feel attached to and trust you but also you need to learn to understand your baby’s cues. If you tune out the baby’s crying it’s harder to do this. I recently heard about some parents who thought they just had a fussy baby and left her to cry-it-out only to find out later that she had such severe reflux that she needed surgery to repair her esophagus. They didn’t realize because they just ignored her crying.
One comment we get all the time is that Griffin is such a happy baby. Even the person insisting we should “let” him cry-it-out says he’s the happiest baby she’s ever known. I don’t think this is a coincidence. A friend of ours goes to two mother’s groups, one near where she lives and one at the the birth center. She was telling me she didn’t like going to the one near her house because the babies are always crying. Which got us thinking – the mother’s group at the birth center has up to thirty babies and we’re there for an hour and a half every Thursday. All of the parents there practice attachment parenting. And the babies don’t cry. They nurse, they sleep, they look around, the older ones play. And we had just taken this for granted.
So anyway, yes, I think I could get Griffin to sleep through the night by letting him cry-it-out. But it would be at the expense of his happiness and it would betray the trust he has in me. And if that’s the price I don’t care if he doesn’t sleep until college.